Cassidy Hutchinson is still lying

This Cassidy lady is a gift of lies.

I can’t wait to see what Cassidy Hutchinson lies at this point every day when I wake up and check the Internet… and believe me, today’s lie is a misleading one, perhaps the biggest yet, at least with the greatest possible impact.

*** Follow us in Rumble **

So, let me set it up for you … it’s a little complicated, but I think I can present it in a neat and tidy way that is quickly understandable.

I was studying the internet all day, every day, and I happened to be on a tweet from a guy named Mike Davis.

Mike’s Twitter bio says: Ex: Chief Counsel for Nomination, US Senate Committee on the Judiciary * Law Clark, Justice Gorsuch

So, the guy definitely got some chops.

Mike caught my attention because he wrote a Twitter thread claiming that he had evidence (email) involving WAPO, which shows that they know without a doubt that Cassidy Hutchinson lied again.

This time it’s about Jeff Clark, a former senior judicial official.

You remember Jeff, don’t you? He received “Roger Stone” treatment by the Fed for watching the 2020 election. The Fed shows him and launches an operation on or around June 15.

More news: Michelle has been “equipped” to run for 2024 WH for 6 years, and she is using Barak’s “formula”

Well, let’s find out, Cassidy told the committee on Jan. 6 that Mr. Clark was “often” in the White House, tactical to object to the election with Giuliani and Trump’s campaign.

However, like everything this woman did, it was a lie.

Here is his testimony from March 7th.

Every Mike Davis says it’s 100 percent false.

He said Giuliani and Tim Trump never met or contacted Mr. Clarke.

And now, it seems to confirm the source that it has inside WAPO.

Here is what Mike said:

“I spoke to a well-established source and I have a confirmation email between ashwashingtonpost and another well-established source. So the Washington Post knows Mrs. Hutchinson’s testimony is not true. When will Wapo report this? “

Its source spot-on will appear because there is an email exchange between the two:

So, here’s what that email means:

*** Follow us on Clouthave **

A WAPO reporter named Michael Cranish emailed someone to ask about the testimony of Jeff Clark of Cassidy, the man who ran the Fed.

Cranish wanted to verify that Mr. Jeff Clark was actually “often” in the White House, as Cassidy claimed he was, or was it a “misidentification” incident?

The man, named Robert Costello, responded, saying it was indeed a “misidentification.”

He says the man who was “often” at the White House was named Justin Clark.

Justin, not Jeff, to cry out loud …

Here’s the tweet thread from Mike:

On March 7, 2022, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified @ January 6thCmte Jeff Clark, a former senior official in the Department of Justice, strategized with Giuliani and Trump campaigning in the White House to object to the election.

100% false.

They never met or communicated. pic.twitter.com/9qjWq6KjtV

– Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (rdmrddmia) June 29, 2022

Dear god

This Cassidy girl is literally a coffee-feature, who really thought she knew a lot more than him.

But the biggest question here is why this particular testimony of Cassidy is so important.

What did he say under the oath of office of the J6 Comedian, the FBI went and raided Mr. Clark?

And if so, it is now beginning to look and smell like Russian fraud and all those fake FISA warrants, right?

I will tell you, when the GOP regains control, if they do not investigate the investigators and everyone involved in this J6-three-ring comic circus, they will have to vote outside the office.

Because mark my words, Dems and RINOS are going to take J6 and turn it into Russia Hawks Part 2 and use the same techniques they did before.

**** Follow us on Telegram ***

Why not?

They got through it for the first time, didn’t they?